<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sound Off: DRM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ourdigitalmusic.com/2008/07/sound-off-drm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ourdigitalmusic.com/2008/07/sound-off-drm/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:00:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruno Carriere</title>
		<link>http://www.ourdigitalmusic.com/2008/07/sound-off-drm/comment-page-1/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno Carriere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 15:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourdigitalmusic.com/sound-off-drm/#comment-452</guid>
		<description>Is anyone out there still really for DRM?  It&#039;s bad for everyone.

As a small label we held up going digital until iTunes came up with iTunes+.  It just doesn&#039;t make sense that music bought digitally would be MORE restricted than music bought on CD.  The main appeal of digital formats is ease of distribution and flexibility and with DRM, you lose all of that.

Now as soon as lossless compression becomes ubiquitous the &#039;audio quality&#039; problem will be put to rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anyone out there still really for DRM?  It&#8217;s bad for everyone.</p>
<p>As a small label we held up going digital until iTunes came up with iTunes+.  It just doesn&#8217;t make sense that music bought digitally would be MORE restricted than music bought on CD.  The main appeal of digital formats is ease of distribution and flexibility and with DRM, you lose all of that.</p>
<p>Now as soon as lossless compression becomes ubiquitous the &#8216;audio quality&#8217; problem will be put to rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ana</title>
		<link>http://www.ourdigitalmusic.com/2008/07/sound-off-drm/comment-page-1/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Ana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourdigitalmusic.com/sound-off-drm/#comment-451</guid>
		<description>Anti-DRM! I&#039;m hugely in favor of the changes that have begun in the music industry. And that is coping with the rise in digital technology by changing their business models.

There&#039;s still money to be made out there, without restricting song usage. The music industry is just slow to change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anti-DRM! I&#8217;m hugely in favor of the changes that have begun in the music industry. And that is coping with the rise in digital technology by changing their business models.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s still money to be made out there, without restricting song usage. The music industry is just slow to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petar</title>
		<link>http://www.ourdigitalmusic.com/2008/07/sound-off-drm/comment-page-1/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Petar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourdigitalmusic.com/sound-off-drm/#comment-450</guid>
		<description>please let DRM die soon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please let DRM die soon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>